Submitted by Taps Coogan on the 6th of April 2018 to The Sounding Line.
Enjoy The Sounding Line? Click here to subscribe for free.
Piecing together data from a variety of sources, the following chart shows the US balance of trade since 1790, shortly after the country’s founding.
The US maintained very closely balanced trade for the first 200 years of the country’s history. From 1790 until 1974, the last year in which the US ran a trade surplus, the US exported roughly $100 billion more than it imported. Since 1974, the US has run a cumulative trade deficit exceeding $11 trillion. In other words, in the last 44 years the US trade deficit was 110 times larger than the trade surplus it amassed during all previous American history. The massive deterioration in the US balance of trade since the 1970s is both historically anomalous and highly unsustainable. That multiple Presidents and Congresses have come and gone without taking serious action to correct the imbalance is indefensible, particularly given the American people’s near universal recognition of the problem and its deleterious impacts.
The US is not starting a trade war, the US has been in a trade war since the 1970s and it has been losing badly.
As we discussed here, the bulk of America’s trading problem is not with its free trade partners. Over the years, the US has entered into free trade agreements with 20 countries and has seen its balance of trade improve with 16 of them since adopting an agreement. The notable exceptions are Mexico and Israel. The following chart shows the change in the balance of trade for a subset of the US’s free trade partners indexed to the inception of the respective agreement.
The two-thirds of the US trade deficit is a result of trade with China. The US trade deficit with China is roughly $375 billion, 66% of the total US deficit. If the US managed to eliminate its trade deficit with every country in the world expect China, it would still have the largest trade deficit in the world.
The rarely discussed truth of the matter is that, in addition to a host of non-tariff trade barriers and intellectual property theft, Chinese import tariffs are over twice as high as import tariffs in the US. That the Chinese feel the need to maintain such high import barriers, despite their huge trade surplus and far lower manufacturing costs, is remarkable. They are trying to protect their high tech industries from American competition while denying the US the same privilege.
About 19% of Chinese exports go to the US, making the US the largest export destination for Chinese goods. Conversely, only about 8% of US exports go to China, the third largest export destination for the US. Furthermore, foreign trade represent a larger piece of the Chinese economy than it does in the US. Chinese exports to the US are also more often products that can be manufactured in other lower labor cost economies such as India, Taiwan, or Mexico.
Given all of these factors, China’s seemingly overt unwillingness to take serious action to remedy a clearly unsustainable situation is likely to encourage, not deter, further American tariffs. It will be to everyone’s detriment, but mostly theirs.
P.S. If you would like to be updated via email when we post a new article, please click here. It’s free and we won’t send any promotional materials.
Would you like to be notified when we publish a new article on The Sounding Line? Click here to subscribe for free.
but do we want to bring back assembly line type jobs to US which under minimum wage laws would cause prices to spike and cause inflation. Conversely, assembly line operations lead to application technology gains and innovation. Also intellectual property is highly mobile because machinery manufacturers and technology firms, like chip makers, are eager to sell overseas and not restricted by export controls. Keep in mind largest US exports worldwide are military equipment and agriculture while imports from China are electronics,computers and consumer items. Entire argument is Nationalism vs. Globalism with US underwriting Globalism with huge unsustainable deficits. Only way… Read more »
You forgot to mention currency manipulation – a major factor in ‘managing’ global trade. We don’t play that game well.
Good point
At this point, much of what the US imports from China doesn’t even have that much labor cost. It is just that the tariffs and regulatory/technology transfer barriers make it such a hassle to import something into China. Go to a big box store and nearly everything is made in China. Not just outside the US but in China specifically. There are lots of other cheap places to make stuff but its so hard to get anything into China that everything just ends up getting made there to begin with. The things China allows to be imported in quantity are… Read more »
Note the precipitous 15-year decline in our BOT beginning ca. 1996~97; no doubt an artifact of NAFTA and Clinton granting MFN status to the Chi-Coms. A disastrous sled run that we’re still paying for today, esp. with regard to the strengthening of their military – all thanks to export licenses the Clinton admin’ granted for missile guidance and targeting technology. I worked for 30-odd years with Chinese tech’ JVs and privately, they still marvel that we were so stupid. And yet, the technology transfers and IP theft goes on at a much higher rate today. Corporate greed has made China… Read more »
East India Company….the greatest onslaught against humanity in the whole configuration