Submitted by Taps Coogan on the 8th of January 2019 to The Sounding Line.
Enjoy The Sounding Line? Click here to subscribe for free.
James Grant, of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, recently spoke with CNBC about the state of markets and the difficulty of forecasting the future in an era which has, according to him, “no precedent.”
James Grant:
“I think that people are too certain about things about which they should not be certain. The future is a closed book to begin with and… we are in a moment that literally has no precedent. Almost everything in finance has been seen before. What is new and different (now) is the following: We have $8.5 trillion of securities priced to yield less than zero worldwide. At no point in the Treasury yield curve is an investor earning greater than zero after inflation and taxes. Interest rates, by one measure in 2016…, were the lowest they had been in four or five hundred years. So we are in an environment of extraordinarily accomodative (monetary policy), essentially free capital. We’ve been in an era of essentially free money for many years. Free money is lovely, but in spending it, people will do things they wouldn’t have done had that capital cost something substantial…”
“The future is not the Fed’s best subject, nor is it humanity’s best subject, yet we sit around here listening to people telling us what’s going to happen in March. Is it going to rain next Tuesday? So I would say we don’t know a lot and…, in view of these most extraordinary circumstances…, we ought to be prepared for all manner of outcomes, many of which are unscripted…”
“I think the Fed’s balance sheet ought to be much smaller than it is, but having said that…, we ought not to underestimate the possible consequences of normalization. This economy is capitalized for ultra-low interest rates… A 100 basis point cost (1% increase) in the federal borrowing is going to cost the taxpayers a $160-odd-billion a year…”
“The leading indicator of inflation in the early ’60s were rates of inflation of less than 2%, often less than 1%, in succession for about four or five years…, and then suddenly the world changed. Later (historians) said the failed anchovy harvest off Peru, or the Federal Reserve’s mismanagement of its interest rate during the Vietnam war, or a demographic shift… Inflation, or changes in the prices level, often come as surprises… I think we live in an age of inflation… We will look back on this as a period in which inflation was building. and one day inflation will be a ponderable number, say 4%, and this could happen in the next couple of years, and 4% in this environment would be a very disturbing thing.”
There is more to the interview, so enjoy it above.
P.S. If you would like to be updated via email when we post a new article, please click here. It’s free and we won’t send any promotional materials.
Would you like to be notified when we publish a new article on The Sounding Line? Click here to subscribe for free.
Jim is full of it. The only ones getting free money are the too-big-to-fail banks who get to pay us no interest- but they still get to charge double-digit rates for card-holders
Well done Taps, again you have found a little-noticed gem and elevated it into our line of vision. When it comes to wealth the concept of relative value is more important than most of us have come to believe. Being aware of this link may prove very important to preserving your wealth and “buying power” in the future. This is important because we live in a world where the state of real value is always dependent on, or determined by a commodity or an item’s relationship to something else such as supply or demand. It should not slip by unnoticed… Read more »
There is excessive wealth inequality, excess savings and excess capital so where do you think interest rates are heading? If the zero lower bound is not removed and cash is not taxed, things may implode. Whether or not negative rates are good or bad is not the question. They may become a systemic necessity. It is simple supply and demand and has to do with ‘time preference’ and ‘capitalist spirit’.
http://www.naturalmoney.org/endofusury.html
The alternative may be wealth taxes. That can push up interest rates. That is not going to happen, of course.