Submitted by Taps Coogan on the 12th of September 2018 to The Sounding Line.
Enjoy The Sounding Line? Click here to subscribe for free.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, recently gave a rare and wide ranging interview to CNBC to discuss his new book ‘A Template for Understanding Big Debt Crises’ (it can be downloaded for free here), and to share his outlook for the economy. Mr. Dalio argues that the best historical analogue for the current economic environment is the 1930s.
Watch CNBC’s full interview with Ray Dalio on lessons from the financial crisis from CNBC.
Mr. Dalio:
“Generally speaking, we are in… the seventh inning of this cycle. I think we are at the stage in the cycle where interest rates are being raised. We’re in the later stage. Maybe we have… two more years… into the cycle and then the issues of this debt crisis are very different than the issues of the last debt crisis. Each one is a little bit unique. This one looks very much more like the 1935 to… 1940 period. 1929 to ’32 and 2008 to 2009 we had a debt crisis and interest rates hit zero. In both of those cases interest rates hit zero, the only two times in the century. There is only one thing to do next and that is to print money and buy financial assets. So in both of those cases that’s what the central bank did and they pushed asset prices up. As a result we had an expansion, we had markets rising, and we particularly had an increase in the wealth gap because if you’d owned financial assets, you got richer and if you didn’t you didn’t. And so today we’ve got a wealth gap that’s the largest since that period (the 1930s)… As a result, we have populism. Populism is the disenchanted, capitalism not working for the majority of people… So we have a political gap, a social gap in terms of the economics, and we are coming into the phase where we are beginning the tightening cycle. 1937 we (began) a tightening cycle. No tightening cycle ever works out perfectly. That’s why we have recessions. You can’t get it perfectly. So as we are going into this particular cycle, we have to think, what will this downturn be like…?”
On the prospect of less effective monetary policy in the future:
“We have less effective monetary policy because so far there are two types of monetary used: Lowering interest rates, we can’t lower interest rates. The second is quantitative easing and it’s maximized its effect. So I think that the next downturn is going to be a different type of downturn. I think that pension problems, healthcare problems in terms of obligations that are not funded, that are not debt, I think it will be more difficult in terms of the social political problems and I think it will be more difficult to handle. It won’t be… the same in terms of the big bang debt crisis. It will be a slower growing, more constricting sort of debt crisis that I think that will have bigger social implications and bigger international implications.”
There is much more to the interview, so enjoy it above.
To see Mr. Dalio explain the economic cycle, read this.
If you would like to be updated via email when we post a new article, please click here. It’s free and we won’t send any spam.
Would you like to be notified when we publish a new article on The Sounding Line? Click here to subscribe for free.
Mr. Dalio’s naarative needs several corrections. The collapse in European and American trade in the post World War 1 depression came from the chain of bank failures that was not relieved by any zero interest rate lending by central banks. People and businesses lost the money they had on deposit, which was the one thing that did not happen in 2008-2009. The outstanding pension and healthcare obligations of the systems that follow Bismarck’s model are enormous, but there is no reason to think they cannot be handled by the same compromises that allowed the European government debts from the Great… Read more »
Interesting points. The ‘compromises that allowed the European government debts from the Great War to be rescheduled and refinanced’ however, did not prevent Germany from cancelling the war reparations in 1933 and kicking off WWII, so I wouldn’t exactly call them universally successful. I hope you are right about the late 1800s being the better comparison. For sure, no historical analogue will be perfect.